8 May 2008 - 11:23am| by | 1 comment

Council tender builds agencies pitching woes

Stirling Council has apparently invited 114 design consultancies to pitch for the layout of a quarterly business newsletter; which has a £50,000 budget over three years.

The move seems to have reinforced fears in the creative industries about speculative pitching in the public sector reaching endemic proportions.

One consultancy, which was invited to take part, declined via an open letter which The Drum publishes in this issue. Written by Victor Brierley and addressed to Joelie Russell at the Council it stated: “We won’t be taking part. Over 100 people, all being asked to supply a bit of simple, template design, for a project you already have done in the past, with The Write People? Eh? Why not just appoint The Write People again and save your guys (and 100 people in our industry) a good deal of time, effort and money.”

Nick Ramshaw, former chair of the Design Business Association in Scotland, and now managing director of Elmwood in Leeds, is also concerned about the growth of this form of pitching.

Also writing in this issue, in response to the leader The Drum published last month, he said: “Agencies meed to say ‘no’ more often. No, if the pitch list is ridiculously long. No to giving away their thinking for free. No, when asked to pitch for very small jobs.”
The row comes on top of rumour that a Glasgow based arts organisation asked five design companies to pitch for a project that had no fee budget at all. “It was a complete insult,” said one of the organisations involved.

Meanwhile, Stirling Council said they had to put this project out to tender because it exceeded the £10,000 threshold that would allow them to make an appointment without a pitch under procurement law.

Comments

9 May 2008 - 10:24
kate_wooding's picture
14
comments

Sorry, but I think there's a difference between inviting agencies to pitch and putting something out to tender. A tender is an open competition where you must advertise the opportunity and have no control over who responds. A pitch is where you invite a selected number of agencies to compete and have complete control over which (and how many) agencies you invite. As a public body, and with a budget over £10k, I would think that the Council was required to put this out to tender. They would have had no control over the number of responses that they would have received, so it may be that 114 agencies were competing - that is the nature of tenders. However, if Stirling Council put 114 agencies through the Pre Qualification Questionnaire stage and Invited them to Tender, that is crazy as it is best procurement practice to whittle the number invited to tender down to a manageable number - and they usually state what this number is at the start of the process. Can anyone clarify what happened?

Write Your Comment

New to The Drum

You will be sent a verification email. Click on the link in the email to post your comment.

Tick to receive daily newsletter full of the latest news in creative marketing and media.
By checking this box you are agreeing to The Drum's website terms and conditions.

Don't miss out... Get your Design news by email

Directory Latest