Facebook has this week been granted a ‘notice of allowance’ to trade mark the word ‘face’ by the US Patent and Trademark Office.
The social networking site – which boasts over 500 million users worldwide – has previously taken aggressive legal action against sites with ‘face’ or ‘book’ in their name, such as Teachbook and Faceporn. Before the trade mark can be registered, however, Facebook will need to prove its commercial use of the mark in the US.
Aidan Clarke, trade mark partner at Marks & Clerk LLP, a leading intellectual property firm, said: “The move is reminiscent of EasyGroup’s crusade to trade mark use of the word ‘easy’ in order to unify their brand offering, from EasyHotel to EasyCruise, and go after third party uses of other ‘easy’ marks. The right to the word ‘face’ would certainly prove a much more powerful weapon than simply having a trade mark for ‘facebook’, and it would also lend the company flexibility to use the ‘face’ prefix for future product extensions. Facebook’s various past wranglings with sites that have ‘face’ or ‘book’ in their name is testament to its determination to monopolise these terms and ensure the reach of their brand. The company has made similar moves to register ‘book’.
“The notice of allowance means that Facebook has essentially been given the green light by the authorities. However a quirk of the US system means that it will need to demonstrate commercial use of ‘face’, rather than ‘facebook’, before it can register the mark, and this could prove to be a snag. Interestingly enough, European trade mark law doesn’t require any such demonstration of use, and in fact the mark is now registered in Europe.
“Nevertheless, not every company with the word ‘face’ as part of its brand should necessarily be worried. The protection in the US at least covers only a very specific category of commercial enterprises within a sub-sector of the telecommunications space, namely the sorts of activities that comprise online social networking. ‘Fatface’ the clothing company and Apple’s ‘FaceTime’ software, to name but a few examples, have nothing to be concerned about. Not unless Facebook begins extending its brand beyond the social networking sphere.”
You will be sent a verification email. Click on the link in the email to post your comment.
Comments
Utter nonsense.
Kind of the opposite of what the internet should be about is it not?
comments
Am I allowed to say something ----tious?
Maybe the English should patent our own frigging language and not let these stupid idiots in the US (as that's where they always seem to be from) make a mockery of it.
If the American patent office can be so absurd, why shouldn't we?
Does that mean I cant watch Face Off again on DVD? I love Castor Troy? Shame.
Can I patent the word 'book'? That should screw things up for them.
Or patent the word 'ace'.
You can't say Facebook, because my word is inside your word. So there.
comments
how ridiculous... do you think they should look at securing derivatives also before someone gets there first?
face book, mug book, pan book, coupon book, boatrace book, fizzog book
comments
If it does only relate to "a very specific category of commercial enterprises within a sub-sector of the telecommunications space, namely the sorts of activities that comprise online social networking" then fair enough.
If you call your new social network facemag.com (or similar) I don't think you've made an effort to do something original and you're clearly trying to gain some advantage by associating yourself with facebook. You are therefore fair game for legal action.
If you're a face painting company have a website at facepaint.com, then that's very different. At least I'd hope so.
comments
It will only apply to social networking,
i'm sure apple will have a slight issue with their new 'facetime' being called 'time'
They need a punch in the face.
Write Your Comment